Test Results

 1 947 files  ±0   1 947 suites  ±0   1h 35m 49s ⏱️ - 1m 52s
 4 720 tests ±0   4 696 ✅ ±0   24 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
14 160 runs  ±0  13 993 ✅ ±0  167 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 1fd2c51. ± Comparison against base commit 401d483.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

As it might be that the wrong attribute name is used in existing data, should at least reading the wrong name be used to recover such values?

Yes, of course this is used in a memento to serialize the value so all existing serializations will lose that value and that can't be a good thing.

I can keep attribute value as misspelled and refactor variables name only